/website-audit

Website Audit

Status: draft Owner: Gregorio Reviewer: Robbie Confidence: medium Source: strategic-interpretation Updated: 2026-05-28

Two websites. One system problem.

The marketing site sells a broad AI-agent promise. The agents site reveals the real system: Mission Control, Backbone, Orchestrator, AutoCompany, Projects, domain workspaces, and specialist sub-agents.

The redesign must connect these into one coherent mental model.

The product is stronger than the current story.

System reading

LayerCurrent stateSystem implication
Current stockLarge agent catalogue and ambitious architectureHigh product depth, but difficult to understand quickly
Current flowVisitors receive features before they understand the systemCognitive overload before trust formation
System failureBuyers struggle to classify the categoryLower conversion and weaker VC narrative

Website comparison

Audit lensMain websiteAgents websiteDesign decision
PositioningBroad AI automationAI operations control planeLead with control plane / Mission Control, not agent count
TrustNeeds more proof and specificityHas strong trust primitives: approvals, traces, shadow modeMove trust primitives into the homepage narrative
Information designConceptual and market-facingArchitectural and denseCreate progressive disclosure: simple narrative first, architecture second
Buyer actionDemo / plan comparisonAccount and onboarding pathUse one CTA hierarchy: “Book an AI Ops System Review”

Redesign principle

Do not present Lightbulb as “80+ specialized AI agents.” Present it as a governed system for coordinating agentic work.

Working positioning:

Mission Control for agentic companies.